The last round-up on blacklisting (for now)

(New readers start here: Last year I wrote a story for The Guardian on blacklisting. Following this the Information Commissioner launched an investigation. This week that resulted in a vetting agency being shut down and dozens of construction companies named as clients. And Rob Evans and I at The Guardian got the scoop which was widely picked up. This is a collection of links to those follow ups. See here and here for my two other updates.)

Update 14.33pm: The Daily Kos has a very thoughtful piece.

Update 13.06pm: Apparently a motion is going before the Scottish Labour Conference asking the government to make blacklisting illegal.

*******

What's been missing from the news reports so far have been responses from the industry and the Conservative Pary.

So thank you the Daily Mail whose report (almost) managed both. Tory MP David Davis, who resigned over civil liberty issues etc etc, gave a very interesting quote.

"My own grandfather was blacklisted for his political and trade union activities, and could not work as a result. This can have a devastating effect, punishing whole families for people exercising their democratic rights."

Davis, who grew up on a council estate while his colleagues on the front bench owned estates, can empathise but that that seems a step too far for his party which has maintained its silence.
Does that have anything to do with fact that construction companies have traditionally been key funders?.

Or perhaps because they agree with economist Ruth Lea also quoted by the Mail (I'm glad someone's going to these people to see what they think) but know its repugnant to a large section of the electorate.

Lea, who was always on TV representing the Institute of Directors, is now always on TV representing the Arbuthnot Banking Group. So much on TV that if I was her manager I'd give her some proper work to do.

Lea said: "Checking employment records is exactly what companies should be doing. The idea that they should not be able to find out about prospective employees strikes me as bizarre."

And the Confederation of British Industry (again courtesy of the Daily Mail) declined to condemn the company, and other commentators said it was legitimate for employers to want to check out people they were hiring.

Declined to condemn a company which broke the law. Is it even beyond them to even ask companies to follow the law?

Construction News has a round-up of how the companies named by the Commissioner have responded. I could have saved them time by sending them the results of two days of doing just that for the Guardian since they've not decided to say anything new. I thought N G Bailey gave a hostage to fortune by announcing an investigation when most others just tried to shut the conversation down (as I would have). Look forward to finding out what Bailey's investigation reveals.

And more on the views from the other side, Man Of The Woods blog says the case is clearly evidence of...left wing hypocrisy. I was about to explain why but it's so silly just go and read it yourself. Dave Osler goes at the issue from a similar angle but gets his points across rather better, I feel.

Credit to MOTW though for at least considering the topic. Iain Dale and fellow Tory bloggers, so keen usually to stand up for freedom and who profess to bow to no-one, remain silent on the issue. Still, Paul Staines has got some more jokes about Gordon Brown having one eye so that's all right then.

Newsnight's report last night mentioned the Economic League, former emloyers of Ian Kerr, an angle barely covered elsewhere. It had some great archive footage of the Friedman's stormtroopers giving evidence to a parliamentary select committee. Waiting for the footage to go up on the site. I wonder where Kerr's colleagues in the league ended up? Did others, like him, continue the great fight?
 
Missed this in my previous round-ups from Guardian's Comment Is Free where they nominated Kerr as civil liberties villain of the week.

Wikipedia entry on The Consulting Association.

Here are letters to the Guardian on the story. Jon Rogers from Unison writes:

Presumably the construction companies who deny any wrongdoing in your report of the illegal activities of a former employee of the discredited Economic League will be investigating collusion in illegal activities by the managers and human resources officers.

And I think this angle on where were the HR managers is interesting since they must have known. I wonder what their professional associations and trade press think about the issue? It suggests a failure of professionalism in that sector, I would suggest.

The Information Commissioner will be launching a hotline for people to ring in and check if they were on the blacklist, reports Ucatt. The ICO has details on the helpline here.

The TUC issued a statement saying blacklisting is 'deplorable'. General Secretary Brendan Barber said:

“The Government must act now and bring in the 1999 blacklisting regulations, to give workers proper protection and access to redress.”

The Experiment blog covers the story.

And so does Organized Rage.

Here is a comment from Cheryl's Mewsings over in the US. Also in America, the University of Washington's Computer Security Research and Course blog picks up on the story.

Alan Ritchie, general secretary at Ucatt has been a fixture in the television and radio studios commentating on the story, which has been very helpful in his forthcoming election.

Unite has issued a statement.

I've got some more material from The Consulting Association such as blacklisted Steve Acheson's file and am working out how to best this (large pdf) file up.